Convert Images to WEBP Online - Free WEBP Converter
Drag images here or click to select
Supported formats: JPG, PNG, GIF, BMP, TIFF, SVGWhat is WEBP format?
WEBP is a modern image format developed by Google. It offers both lossy and lossless compression and supports transparency and animations. WEBP files are significantly smaller than JPG or PNG while maintaining high quality.
Why convert images to WEBP?
Excellent compression
WEBP provides 25-35% smaller files than JPG and 25-50% smaller than PNG at the same quality.
Transparency support
Unlike JPG, WEBP supports an alpha channel for transparency.
Broad support
WEBP is supported in all modern browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari.
How to use this tool?
- Upload images - Click the “Browse files” button or simply drag images into the designated area
- Set quality - Select the quality level (75-90% recommended)
- Automatic conversion - Images will be automatically converted to WEBP format
- Download - Download individual images or all of them at once as a ZIP archive
Browser support
WEBP is supported in:
- Chrome - all versions
- Edge - all versions
- Firefox 65 and newer
- Safari 14 and newer (iOS 14, macOS Big Sur)
- Opera - all versions
Supported input formats
The tool supports conversion from these formats:
- JPG/JPEG - the most common photographic format
- PNG - including transparency, which will be preserved
- GIF - static and animated images
- BMP - basic bitmap format
- TIFF - professional format
- SVG - vector graphics
Quality settings
WEBP quality determines the ratio between file size and image quality:
- 85-95% - high quality, larger files
- 75-85% - optimal for most uses
- 65-75% - smaller files, still good quality
- Below 65% - small files, visible quality loss
Comparison with other formats
For the same visual quality:
- WEBP vs JPG - 25-35% smaller files
- WEBP vs PNG - 25-50% smaller files (even more for photos)
- WEBP vs GIF - 60-80% smaller files for animations
When to use WEBP?
Ideal for:
- Websites and applications
- Photos with transparent backgrounds
- Images requiring smaller file sizes
- Modern projects with current browser support
Less suitable for:
- Projects requiring support for older browsers
- Printing (use PNG or TIFF)
- Maximum compression (consider AVIF)
Practical advantages of WEBP
Real file size savings
| Original Format | Original Size | WEBP Size | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| PNG logo | 150 KB | 45 KB | 70% |
| JPG photo (90% quality) | 2.5 MB | 1.6 MB | 36% |
| PNG screenshot | 800 KB | 250 KB | 69% |
| Animated GIF | 5 MB | 1.2 MB | 76% |
Impact on web performance
Example: E-shop with 50 product images
- JPG total: 50 × 400 KB = 20 MB
- WEBP total: 50 × 280 KB = 14 MB
- Savings: 6 MB = faster loading by 2-4 seconds
Core Web Vitals
Google evaluates loading speed:
- ⚡ LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) - WEBP accelerates loading of main images
- 📊 CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) - Smaller files = fewer shifts
- ⏱️ FID (First Input Delay) - Faster loading = earlier interactivity
WEBP vs Other Formats
WEBP vs JPG
Photo 1920×1080:
├─ JPG (85% quality): 850 KB
├─ WEBP (85% quality): 580 KB (-32%)
└─ Visual quality: Identical
Advantages of WEBP:
- ✅ 25-35% smaller at the same quality
- ✅ Supports transparency (JPG does not)
- ✅ Supports animations (JPG does not)
Disadvantages of WEBP:
- ⚠️ Poorer support in older software
- ⚠️ Longer compression time
WEBP vs PNG
Logo with transparency 800×600:
├─ PNG: 320 KB
├─ WEBP: 95 KB (-70%)
└─ Transparency: Preserved in both
When to use WEBP instead of PNG:
- Web and applications (speed more important than compatibility)
- Modern platforms
- Images with transparency
When to stick with PNG:
- Graphic design (Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator)
- Professional printing
- Maximum compatibility
WEBP vs GIF
Animation 500×500, 30 frames:
├─ GIF: 4.2 MB
├─ WEBP: 950 KB (-77%)
└─ Color quality: WEBP 16M colors, GIF 256 colors
WEBP animations are better than GIF:
- 🎨 Millions of colors instead of 256
- 📦 60-80% smaller files
- 🔍 Higher quality without dithering
Implementing WEBP on the web
HTML with fallback
<picture>
<source srcset="image.webp" type="image/webp">
<source srcset="image.jpg" type="image/jpeg">
<img src="image.jpg" alt="Image description">
</picture>
How it works:
- Modern browsers load WEBP
- Older browsers load JPG
- All users see the image
CSS background
.hero {
background-image: url('hero.jpg');
}
/* Modernizr or @supports */
.webp .hero {
background-image: url('hero.webp');
}
Automatic server-side detection
# .htaccess - Apache
<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} image/webp
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.webp -f
RewriteRule ^(.+)\.(jpe?g|png)$ $1.webp [T=image/webp,E=accept:1]
</IfModule>
Migrating from JPG/PNG to WEBP
Strategy for an existing website
Phase 1: Preparation
- Back up all original images
- Convert all JPG/PNG to WEBP (80-85% quality)
- Save WEBP next to the original files
Phase 2: Implementation
- Use the
<picture>element with a fallback - Update CSS for background images
- Test in all browsers
Phase 3: Monitoring
- Monitor PageSpeed Insights score
- Check Core Web Vitals
- Analyze analytics data
Process automation
# cwebp - official tool from Google
cwebp -q 85 input.jpg -o output.webp
# Batch conversion of all JPGs
for file in *.jpg; do
cwebp -q 85 "$file" -o "${file%.jpg}.webp"
done
Cross-platform support
Browsers
| Browser | Version | Support from |
|---|---|---|
| Chrome | 17+ | 2011 |
| Firefox | 65+ | 2019 |
| Edge | 18+ | 2018 |
| Safari | 14+ | 2020 |
| Opera | 11+ | 2011 |
| Samsung Internet | 4+ | 2016 |
Coverage: More than 95% of internet users (2024)
Mobile devices
- ✅ Android 4.0+ (2011)
- ✅ iOS 14+ (2020)
- ✅ Chrome Mobile - all versions
- ✅ Firefox Mobile 68+
Software
- ⚠️ Adobe Photoshop - Plugin required
- ⚠️ GIMP - Yes (with plugin)
- ✅ Figma - Native export
- ✅ Canva - Supports WEBP
- ⚠️ Microsoft Office - Limited support
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Is WEBP really better than JPG?
Yes, WEBP provides 25-35% smaller files at the same quality. Google and other tech giants actively use it.Why aren't all websites using WEBP?
The main reasons: older software, the need for a fallback for older browsers, and inertia (websites don't migrate that quickly).Can I use WEBP for email?
No, email clients have limited support. For emails, use JPG or PNG.Does WEBP support EXIF metadata?
Yes, WEBP supports EXIF, XMP, and ICC profiles, just like JPG.Is WEBP suitable for printing?
No, for printing, use PNG (lossless) or TIFF. WEBP is primarily for web and digital media.How can I view WEBP in Photoshop?
Download and install the WebP plugin from Google or use alternative editors like GIMP or Photopea.Will I lose quality when converting from PNG to WEBP?
No, you can use lossless WEBP compression (-lossless), which preserves 100% quality at a smaller size.
Are animated WEBPs better than GIFs?
Yes, WEBP animations are significantly smaller (60-80%) and support millions of colors compared to 256 for GIF.Advanced WEBP settings
Compression types
-
Lossy
- Quality 0-100
- Ideal for photos
- Small file sizes
-
Lossless
- No data loss
- Ideal for graphics
- Larger than lossy, smaller than PNG
-
Near-lossless
- Compromise between lossy and lossless
- Almost imperceptible loss
- Significantly smaller than lossless
Optimization parameters
# High quality (90%) for portfolio
cwebp -q 90 -m 6 input.jpg -o output.webp
# Balanced (80%) for general web
cwebp -q 80 -m 4 input.jpg -o output.webp
# Aggressive compression (70%) for thumbnails
cwebp -q 70 -m 2 input.jpg -o output.webp
# Lossless for logos and graphics
cwebp -lossless input.png -o output.webp
Future of WEBP
Competitor: AVIF
AVIF is a newer format with even better compression (20-30% more than WEBP), but:
- ⚠️ Support is still growing
- ⚠️ Slower compression
- ⚠️ Higher CPU demands
Recommendation: Use WEBP now, monitor AVIF for the future
Adoption by major players
- Google - Prefers WEBP across all services
- Facebook/Meta - WEBP for photos
- YouTube - Thumbnails in WEBP
- WordPress - Native support since version 5.8
- Shopify - Automatic conversion to WEBP
Advantages of this tool
- 100% Free - no registration or limitations
- Privacy protection - all processing occurs locally in your browser
- Batch processing - convert multiple images at once
- Transparency preservation - alpha channel remains intact
- Adjustable quality - control over the size/quality ratio
- No size limit - no file size restrictions
- Fast - instant conversion without uploading to a server
- Modern technology - Utilizes the latest web standards
- SEO benefit - Smaller images = better PageSpeed